A Difficult Conversation: Our Local Community Banks. Are They On Your Mind Too?


Curiosity struck me recently as I became interested in how our local community banks have faired in the aftermath of the ‘Credit Crisis’ that ensnared our country and the rest of world.  For the most part, it has been all quiet on the South Plains banking front with virtually no public mention of local financial stress–that’s a good thing.  If I recall correctly, around 2009 and after the credit crisis had a firm grip on the nation, one or two local news sources had reported that one of largest banks originally from West Texas did in fact take a form of TARP money, but not for reasons of financial stress.  The bank did it mainly to access cheap government money to shore up the bank’s balance sheet to continue to fund the growth into the larger metropolitan areas in Texas. Perhaps it’s just crafty business for the leaders of that bank to take advantage of their FDIC-insured status and our nation’s financial crisis to access taxpayers’ money to be used to finance their ambition to pull away from their local peers. Why shouldn’t Wall Street’s tactics work here? Personally, it leaves a bad taste in my mouth, just because you can, doesn’t mean you should.

All that aside, my anecdotal viewpoint is that the Lubbock and surrounding areas have fared well in years after the initial credit crisis, with many small banks thriving.  The 3-legged stool of economic stability in West Texas has long consisted of agriculture, non-profit organizations, and the oil and gas industry has held steady in the face of a disruptive, malingering economic recession that has plagued counterpart cities of similar size across the country.  Here in West Texas, it’s the right balance between risk, reward, and responsibility.  The stability and prosperity of this region make it uniquely attractive to start-up banks and mega-banks alike. Take a look around, there is no shortage of banks that want your loan business and deposits.

So, is there a cause for concern in the health and stability of our local banks? Maybe, but discussing this issue (publicly) is like cussing at your mother and using the Lord’s name in vain in the same sentence. It’s almost sacrilege, but I will carry on with my blasphemous view and opinion.  Besides, don’t we all have personal relationships with bankers that extend outside the branch office? Or was that just a commercial?  I don’t have an axe to grind, I have a couple of concerns beyond just the customer service issues I’ve experienced lately with both small and Too-Big-To-Fail, (TBTF) mega-size banks. I write about these concerns from the point of view of an advisor to clients, with client capital to allocate across the risk spectrum. My job is to manage risk and I see risk in our sacred banking cash cows of the community.

One reason you won’t hear about these concerns publicly is that there is a fine line between expressing concern and exclaiming calamity that leads to a run on a bank–the latter is NOT the case.  For the most part, when I hear about concern it’s in my private meetings with clients and prospects that have large deposits at banks of all sizes.  A large deposit is a relative term and the folks that I talk to are more singularly concerned with yield and income than the health of a bank.  These folks have significant cash reserves and they are seeking alternatives to low CD and bank deposit interest rates.  Many realize that holding cash is costing them dearly and that holding cash within the walls of a FDIC-insured financial institution has not been worth the price of admission.  In other words, you may have been better off by replicating your banker’s investment portfolio, and accepting the principal risk, than holding your cash in the bank earning almost nothing.   After all, when you consider inflation and taxes, depositors/CD investors are experiencing negative yields.  The low-interest rate environment that we live in today has forced all types of investors (including bankers) to take on more risk. As it stands now, all savers are pegged to the longer end of the treasury yield curve; whether they are getting paid for it or not.  When interest rates rise in the near future, we will see how well risk is being managed.

From my view, I see some areas of concern in our local banking ecosystem.  The first concern is the rise of the “unbanked.” Those individuals that, for whatever reason, choose not to use a bank for everyday personal transactions.  The next concern is reliance on revenue from non-traditional banking segments and fee revenue, rather than loan growth revenue to support overall bank profitability.  Another area of concern is that there are too many banks chasing the same customer.  A condition that is leading to an extreme of only small banks and megabanks in the West Texas area–Lubbock specifically.  A growth by acquisition strategy is good for the bankers and shareholders but it’s not good for the account holder.  Customers don’t like change or uncertainty.  It certainly narrows the field on which banks are truly local and truly reflect the traditional West Texas banking values they so publicly pride themselves on.  Think about it, have you noticed the change in “terms and conditions” statement to your account in recent years?  Perhaps you haven’t noticed, but I have.  The last area of concern is the greatest–the changing regulatory environment.  If you are a lawmaker and have enacted legislation that bears the name, Frank-Dodd, Durbin Amendment, Sarbanes-Oxley, et. al, you have contributed to the concerns and uncertainty we face.  For better or for worse, we have yet to fully experience the ramifications of the legislation that has been foisted upon the banking and financial services industry.  Those in the financial services industry bear the burden, the customers bear the cost and the legislators proudly declare that they represent the interests of their constituents.

The devil is truly in the details.  As of December 2011, one of the top 4 banks in West Texas (by deposits) is rated a grade “D” by a bank monitoring and analytics company called Institutional Risk Analytics (IRA).  The letter grade for this bank has bounced around over the past 2 years from A to C, with the year-end grade falling to D. This may suggest concern for asset quality and bank capitalization as it could signal progressive deterioration.  I’ve come to respect IRA’s proprietary work on financial institutions.  They were spot-on during the Credit Crisis and their analytics have become an early warning system for problem banks. Bankrate.com currently has the same West Texas bank ranked 2 out of 5 stars.

The early warning indicators and the negative factors that impacted the rating include:

  • Earnings
  • Asset Quality
  • Non-performing Assets (commercial real estate and construction lending)
  • Capital Adequacy (below standard capitalization)

So what does this all mean? In my opinion, we have a local bank that is experiencing trouble with bad loans, it is less profitable and the bank may need to raise capital in the future if conditions continue to worsen.  The truth is, as many have come to loathe Wall Street, our local bankers have been just as culpable, sinful but maybe most are just not as greedy.  If I recall correctly, most of the top 5 banks in West Texas had at one point offered subprime loans through their subprime loan lending department.  If you have ever served on a board of any non-profit organization then you have certainly experienced a conflicted banker softly pitching their bank and their investment management services.  No person or entity is perfect in business, but I see way too many portraying the image of Mr. George Bailey from It’s A Wonderful Life–give me a break.

Friends, there are no “bragging rights,” or “see I told you so,” moment for having this difficult conversation.  My hope is that the imbalances within this bank self-correct and that other banks remain well-capitalized—although troubles do still linger.   If you will notice, I did not mention any bank by name and I don’t consider myself a financial journalist by any stretch of the imagination.  To manage risk you must be able see it and discuss it openly and honestly, no matter how sacred the cash cow may be.

This is a blog post that reflects my thoughts, opinions and conversations with clients, prospects and business owners.

Peace & Prosperity,

MDP

Sources:  Institutional Risk Analytics, Bankrate.com, Subsidy Scope, Treasury Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

Posted in Lubbock,TX | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Two Things You Can Directly Control In An Uncertain Investing World


While it is impossible to control all aspects of investing, here are a couple of things you can directly control in this uncertain investing world.

Temper your investment return expectations.  Easier said than done, I realize.  We continue to live in interesting times and sitting back with the expectation of consistently earning a 10% to 12% annual return in the coming years on your portfolio is not reasonable—in my opinion.  In fact, it is quite feasible and it is certainly within my framework when planning with clients that we are going to continue to live in a low-return environment for many years to come.  An environment where investors will be jaundiced by volatility and where investment returns will be much less than what history has provided.  This is not what an investor wants to hear and I deeply empathize.

Case in point, the California Public Employee’s Retirement System (CalPERS) pension fund, currently has an annual expected rate of return assumption of 7.75%, a lofty return expectation.  In 2011, the pension fund managed to squeeze out a 1.1% investment return—while still positive, it’s well short of the expected return.  The mega-pension fund with assets totaling $219.4 Billion (as of September 30, 2011), has  a  world-class board of directors and access to the world’s best money-managers, yet the pension fund severely underperformed last year.  While it is true that much of the return has to do with how the overall portfolio was positioned, my point is, don’t expect too much from the markets over the next 3 to 5 years, or possibly longer.  Take what you expect to make or use any historically quoted investment return number and reduce that number by half—yes half.  In the esteemed investment world, it’s been dubbed as getting used to “half-sized” returns.  Expect lower returns and determine the impact on your portfolio, the timing for your retirement (if in the near future) and also the impact on generating a retirement income stream.

You have to remember that when planning for your future, it is not about being right and having the “right” investment return or expected return assumption.  It’s the consequences of being wrong that matter most.  Being wrong could mean having more life to live than you have money for!  If the state of California is wrong, they can raise taxes, reduce or freeze benefits for retirees to help accommodate their erroneous return assumptions.  Individuals planning for their retirement don’t have these policy tools. Individuals must review progress often, consider other retirement planning outcomes and try to remedy projected shortfalls in retirement after the luxury of time and income-earning capacity has passed.  Investing for the long-term takes a deep well of patience, perspective and planning.  There are now a few generations of investors that have never experienced current market conditions and the extreme volatility.  For the record, I’ll be happy to eat these words should return outcomes be better than expected!

Another aspect of investing you can directly control is the total cost of ownership for your investments.

As Americans we pride ourselves on owning a car.  We spend countless hours researching engine performance, gas mileage, amenities of the interior of the car such leather seating, the number of cup holders and the list goes on.  We haggle over the price of a car until the price is within a couple of hundred dollars of the dealer’s cost (with emphasis and exaggeration).  By the time the deal is done, we have directly haggled with the salesman, sales manager and possibly the general manager.  Then, we blissfully drive off into the sunset because we got the car we wanted at a great deal.  The next day, buyer’s remorse overwhelms our conscious. Why do we experience car-buyer’s remorse?  Because we failed to plan for the additional cost of insuring the car and also because of the fact that we paid too much to finance the car.  Oops, we didn’t look at the total cost of ownership!

When it comes to the investments we own we do almost the same thing. A ‘financial advisor’ makes recommendations based on the merits of the product he is selling to you and you accept the recommended investment strategy.  In your mind you are thinking if the projected investment returns work out you will be able to:  fund your daughter’s wedding, enjoy a comfortable retirement, help fund your grandchildren’s college education, etc.  What you failed to consider is how much it will cost to buy and own this investment. Nor did you consider if there is a more cost effective option to help you reach your goals and objectives?  The dirty little secret is that the more an investment product costs, the more the financial advisor/broker makes in compensation and that additional compensation doesn’t always translate into a higher return on your investment.  Nor does it always translate to better service.  In my world, service does not mean call-center!

It is an irrefutable fact that the more you pay in sales charges, commissions, mutual fund expenses, bid/ask spreads and fees, the less you make on your investments over time.  In the low-return environment we live in today costs really matter!  The fees and expenses you pay should be clear and simple to understand.  For example, in my firm we get paid directly by the client for financial planning and investment advice.  My fees are based on an hourly fee or the amount of investments under our management and our services are outlined in a written contract.  The client chooses the model to adopt.  Transparency is a rare commodity among “financial advisors.”  I take pride in our simple, clear and client-centered policies.  To be clear, there are engagements where my service offering is not always the cheapest option and the simple reason is there is a true cost to investment advice and expertise.  Be mindful of whether you are receiving investment advice or just advice that is directly related to the product being sold to you.

Stay tuned, in my next piece I will discuss the finer points of financial product salesmanship versus paying for true financial advice.  There is a huge difference between the two.

Peace & Prosperity,

Matthew D. Peck

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Finding Humor In Stock Ticker Symbols


Let’s just get this out-of-the-way, this post is intended to be construed as sophomoric, juvenile and it is my attempt at humor.  Too many in this so-called world of “high finance” or in today’s world, what is left of finance take themselves way too seriously.  So in the spirit of irreverent and fun tomfoolery, I present to you my list of humorous stock ticker symbols that could have been easily imagined by an “Occupy Wall Street” type.  

Symbol Name

BAM

Brookfield Asset Management Inc

DIRT

iPath Pure Beta Agriculture ETN

FUN

Cedar Fair, L.P. Common Stock

GAS

Nicor, Inc. Common Stock

HOG

Harley-Davidson, Inc. Common St

KEG

Key Energy Services, Inc. Common

OMG

OM Group, Inc. Common Stock

POT

Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan

STD

Banco Santander, S.A. Sponsored

USA

Liberty All-Star Equity Fund Co

YUM

Yum! Brands, Inc.

Each ticker is a legitimate company or security that is listed and trades on an American stock exchange.  Feel free to conduct your own due diligence on each company, you may be surprised to learn what each company actually does to bring value to a shareholder—some aren’t so obvious.

 My personal favorite ticker symbol of this group is STD, Banco Santander, S.A. (ADR).   For those that are not familiar with the company, it is a Spanish banking conglomerate.  Being that the ticker STD also stands for Sexually Transmitted Disease, it just goes to show that during the throes of money changing hands, you never know what you might catch!  Furthermore, what were the folks at the New York Stock Exchange and the STD bank executives thinking when they allowed and/or chose this ticker symbol to represent their company? 

Lastly, in the words of Steve Leuthold (a veteran money manager from Minnesota), our thoughts are “sometimes irreverent sometimes irrelevant.”

 Cheers!

 MDP

Posted in 403b, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Most Volatile Substance Known To Man: Gold


As an investment advisor I duly note that I have missed the boat on owning gold in client portfolios.  But I have my reasons—the primary reason for not recommending gold for clients is that it has never met my criteria for inclusion in client accounts.  Gold does not pay a dividend, it does not earn interest, and it seems that the only way gold has legitimacy as an asset class nowadays, is if there is impending global-economic doom.  

If economic doom is on the horizon (and I don’t think it is) gold won’t save you or your purchasing power.  Now, there are other lustful traits that gold exudes.  For example, large flashy jewelry is what we call “bling.”  Many people believe in the power of “bling” as a way to attract a mate or several mates and they feel their “bling” is worth a certain value.  If you have ever caught an episode of the reality show Hardcore Pawn, you will know exactly what I mean—the only reality show I watch by the way.  I’m drawn to the show because it makes the viewing public graphically aware that market functions work in a very unsophisticated manner.  You can only sell something at a price that someone else is willing to pay.  But I digress. 

So, after you strip away the legendary attributes of gold and its ebullience has waned, what is left?  As an old boss put it, “yeah, I still have some of that yellow crap from the late 70s. It just takes up room in my safe.”  After the fact and after the thrill was gone my old boss saw the investment for what it was, a poor-timed decision that has taken a long time to pay off.  The current love affair with gold will end. We have seen this movie before and historically it doesn’t end well for gold investors. 

 Admittedly, I have personally witnessed a couple of fortunate investors that have made a small fortune in the yellow metal.  Rather than holding physical gold, these investors made their small fortune by buying the penny-stocks of companies no one had ever heard of about 8 to 10 years ago.  Whether it was prescience or blind luck is to be determined, but these investors look like total geniuses now.  One question remains. What is their exit strategy?  To be a successful, long-term investor you may have bought an investment at the right price; but, at what price do you sell?  Consider this untimely purchase and excerpt from Peter L. Bernstein’s book, The Power of Gold, the History of an Obsession.

 “The rush into the gold markets produced much the same kinds of results as the gold rush to the Klondike eighty years earlier, where only about four hundred people out of one hundred thousand prospectors hit it rich. Indeed, it is ironic that the State of Alaska Retirement System bought a ton of gold bullion in 1980 at $651 an ounce, and then a second ton at the end of 1980 for which they paid $575.  In March 1983, the state sold out at $414.“  “In the frantic inflationary fevers of the late 1970s and early 1980s, frightened and even sophisticated people turned to gold from dollars.  In the inevitable moment when such turbulence reappears, that history might well repeat itself.”  (Bernstein, 1999)

 With a leadership deficit in Washington and a severely limping global economy, I share the same concerns as any market participant with a desire to escape the depreciating dollar and the haunting reality of uncertainty.  In this uncertain investing world, every investable asset class known to man has experienced tremendous volatility. There has been no place to hide– even with the so called safe-haven that gold is supposed to be.  

With gold,  I have seen positive correlations develop with the movement of stocks and I believe it would be a surprise for most investors to know that the SPDR Gold Shares ETF (ticker: GLD) on a 5 year annualized basis has been more volatile than the S&P 500 Index.  Not really a selling point I know.  However, the volatility in gold we see now is nothing compared to the price volatility gold experienced during the early 80’s when gold reached its peak price of $850 an ounce on January 21st of 1981. On the next day, January 22nd of 1981 the price of gold plunged by 17% to $705.  By 1985, gold was down around $300 where it leveled off and trickled down to approximately $250 an ounce in 1999.   

 In the end, not only did Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker break the back of inflation, he also could also be credited with busting the speculative bubble on gold.  While the inflation rate was around 3.5% annually from 1980 to 1999, gold fell over 60% during the same period.   That is an incredibly long period of time to hold an investment that is a losing proposition and I’m certain it tested the mettle of the staunchest goldbug.  

The sober fact is that most investors, including central banks, college endowments and state retirement systems lost money by holding gold when the gold bubble burst.  To add insult to injury, the inflation protection that had been an inherent quality of gold ownership also fell to the wayside as bonds were yielding double digits and stock yields were as high as 6%.  Who needed gold to hedge inflation when you could out-earn inflation with interest and dividends? Who knew?  All this in retrospect of course.  

 

The future belongs to those who believe and invest in it—that includes enduring the discomfort from the inevitable economic malfunctions and meltdowns that will come and go.  The problem is over time our memories become dim and we become deaf to the lessons that history has provided us.  This leads to my conclusion is that gold is the most volatile substance known to man!  It’s a risky trading vehicle that in my view represents a physical manifestation of volatility, fear and uncertainty.  At best and at current prices it’s a way for folks from all walks of life help to make ends meet by selling their scrap metal.  As the chart above suggests, it might be best to be a seller at these prices rather than a buyer. 

  Gold Facts:

  • In 1980, the $1.6 trillion invested in gold exceeded the market value of $1.4 trillion in U.S. stocks.
  • In January 1980, the price of gold jumped by $110 an ounce to $634 during the first two business days of the month. Bernstein notes that the January 1980 gold market turned out to be one the wildest months of any market, anywhere, anytime.
  • Each bar of gold held in vault storage is impressed with an owner’s seal or other mark for identification.  The process became known as earmarking gold  an expression that evolved from identifying the ownership of domesticated animals.
  • Gold bricks weigh about 30 pounds each or 400 troy ounces.  A cubic foot of gold weighs half a ton.
  • According to one source.  You can draw an ounce of gold into a wire fifty miles in length or you could beat that ounce into a sheet that would cover one hundred square feet.

 Peace and Prosperity,

 Matthew D. Peck


 
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 1 Comment

Steering into the Skid


Do you remember the first time you drove on an icy road?  Seems like an odd question to ask but the question is essential to coping with short-term market events that are coupled with long-term economic uncertainty.  The experience from that moment of slipping and sliding in a rear-wheel drive car is one that you will always remember.  You remember being told to “steer into the skid” during the driver’s education course you took, but it wasn’t until you experienced the moment first-hand that you understood what the term meant.  After all, “steering into the skid” is counterintuitive, it goes against your natural instinct which is to slam on the brakes and jerk the steering-wheel in whatever direction the wheel will turn.  At least that was my first experience.  It took time to understand how your vehicle would operate in icy conditions, but most importantly it was a moment in time that you had to harness your fear and take control amid uncertainty.  As investors, we are in the midst of a terrible global economic winter storm.  But the question is, how have you navigated icy-road (market and economic) conditions?  From the lesson learned so long ago, are you currently “steering into the skid?” Or has fear, and economic uncertainty caused you to veer off course?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

REPOST: Public Enemy #1: BP, Business & Profits, The United States of Anti-business


REPOST from July 2010.

It’s tough out there…being an investor, a shareholder, a retiree, a business-owner, an executive of a publicly traded company—anyone with capital at risk.    It seems that the words business and profit are now met with such disdain and disgust that even the whisper of such words can bring down the wrath and unquestionable scrutiny of an overzealous, far reaching Congressional inquiry, or federal investigation. Or even worse (I’m shaking in my boots) the ire of an American President that wants to know “whose ass to kick.”  

The words business and profit can sure wreck a cocktail conversation.  Recently, I made an economic observation with a mixed crowd of folks I had recently met.  I said nothing earth-shattering in particular, but one remark struck me.  As a women mocked me directly by asking, “if that was something that I learned in business school.”  All I said was that there was a glut of fine art, wine and other collectible items because of the Great Recession.  She was clearly offended and had no horse sense to speak of, but I made no apologies as I can only be myself.  I’m left wondering if business is now on the list of taboo subjects that cannot be discussed.  You know, no discussion of religion, politics, the environment or now—business. What of course is left to chat about?

Make no mistake my friends, business/commerce of all sizes are under assault. They are being demonized, ostracized and politicized.  For what purpose and to what end? Consider for a moment, the companies that represent the S&P 500 Index are hoarding cash on their balances sheets to the tune of $1.5 trillion.  It should be no surprise that these companies and therefore the market itself is anticipating and preparing for a new era of high taxes, an age of re-distribution of wealth and coercion of corporate responsibility via scrupulous re-regulation.   Rather than place more capital in service in the form of capital expenditures, or hiring additional workers to boost economic growth, Corporate America, is holding back with a very watchful eye on Congress.  As if you haven’t noticed.

Two most disturbing statements from the President and his White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel: 

-   ”President Obama, from a stump speech in Quincy, Illinois, “I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money.”

-   ”In the past, corporate America was not only at the table, they owned the table and chairs around it.  Obama doesn’t start off confrontational, but he will be confrontational if there is resistance to the notion that there are other equities.”   White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel.

All political banter aside, take those statements for what they are worth–but the underlying message is the same.  The underlying message is the widely held belief that for far too long “big business” has operated with little or no regulation and that only too few have benefited.  Hold the wagon… little or no regulation, only too few have benefited?  We are now living with the consequences of policies and a regulatory environment in which everyone was entitled to benefit!  We now have a housing glut, healthcare reform that we cannot afford, blank checks to 2 wars that are unending and a paralyzing notion that no one should be allowed to fail.  It all leads to a mindset of entitlement of what one thinks he deserves with little regard to the cost.   

It is understandable that workers in non-financial sectors of various industries (and all investors, for that matter) feel like they have suffered unfairly due to the risk-taking, excess and the unending correction in the financial markets.  Naturally, for some the only way to express that acrimony is by supporting a government that will re-regulate.  Buts let’s be careful of what we wish for.  The legal landscape of this country is changing swiftly, capriciously and with unintended consequences sure to meet us in ways we have yet to discover.   Again, much like the belief that everyone should be entitled to a house led to an oversupply in housing and therefore slump in housing prices.  And since when do we have a Czar for this and that? Or a Special Investigatory Committee Liaison? That is not what I know to be American. 

At the risk of sounding professorial, or like a crusty economist, the free market participant, (aka, shareholder, taxpayer, small businessman) understands that the market will always correct excesses, imbalances and dislocations in any trade or business in due time.  The participant understands that Capitalism is not perfect and the fact that it is not perfect helps to make the market what it is.  Problems always occur when market forces are met with intervention by the firm-hand of government. 

 “If one rejects laissez faire on account of man’s fallibility and moral weakness, one must for the same reason also reject every kind of government action.”   Ludwig Von Mises, Austrian Economist

 Peace and Prosperity,

 MDP

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Yes, People Are Still Retiring


I start this part of the missive by stating that “money is for the living” and “dead people don’t own stuff.”  Those are the words from an eccentric professor I had my junior year of college.  His point was that if you don’t spend your money in retirement, someone else will—your heirs and Uncle Sam. I mention it because I wanted to draw attention to the noteworthy accomplishment of retirement.

Within the coming months I will have a few clients retire. What a glorious day for these folks!  We have performed thorough examinations of their financial health and well-being.  In some cases, our planning extends years back.  During this process we have stress-tested their portfolio to see how it would perform during a prolonged period of low investment returns.  We determined an appropriate income distribution strategy.  In other words how would clients consolidate their accounts and earn a paycheck from their retirement accounts.    But most importantly, we took a close look at the long-term sustainability of their assets to determine the likelihood of outliving their nest egg.  With retirement planning there are 2 stark realities in that we cannot control investment returns or determine with certainty how long we will live.  In our planning, “what-if” scenarios and a well-defined plan of action is better no plan at all.   

Readers might be wondering how is this possible.  Are these folks extraordinarily rich?  Did they win the lottery?  No, none of the above.  They are hard-working, money-saving, everyday folks that have been coached well and have prepared well.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment